A dilemma is a problem with two possible outcomes. There is no one outcome that is clear and unambiguously acceptable. They are the "horns or the dilemma". This term is often used as a cliché but helps distinguish between a dilemma and other predicaments. Sometimes, a dilemma may be classified as either a legal or moral issue.
False dilemmas
False dilemma, also known by false binary or false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy where a person's options can be limited by an untrue presumption. The false dilemma is a very common mistake in decision making. It is possible to miss a false dilemma because it is not based on a valid premise. It is important that you are aware of this and try to avoid it whenever you can.
False dilemmas can be helpful for children, especially when used to simplify decisions and scenarios. Instead of asking your child what shirt he would like to wear, you can ask him to choose from two shirts. You'll give your child the freedom to choose between two shirts.
Conflict-of-Interest situations
When two or more people have conflicting interests, a conflict of interest can occur. This situation can hinder an individual's ability to make an objective decision. An example of this is an employee who bribes his employer to purchase inferior goods. This could put him or her employer in conflict. Sometimes, it can happen when two groups have to be addressed and one group is not in the best interest of the other.
An individual or group can become involved in a conflict if they have conflicts of interest. Board members, for example, have a duty to act in the best interests of the organization. This obligation should not be placed above personal gain and special interests.
Symmetrical cases
In situations of conflict between moral rules, simmetrical dilemmas can arise. In such cases, an agent's role-related responsibilities take precedence above his or she general obligations. The agent may choose to take on more than one job. However, this is not a universal situation, as different cases may involve different precepts.
When the agent has to choose between actions that will harm or benefit another party in symmetrical situations, the moral dilemma is created. These cases are often dismissed because they don't provide an honest reason for the agent to act. Randomization is not a legitimate reason to act. Randomization is justified by the threat to authorship caused arbitrariness.
Interpersonal moral conflicts
Interpersonal moral conflicts are the conflicts that arise between individuals over moral and ethical matters. These conflicts can be caused by differences in the personal values between the individuals. Factual conflicts can often been resolved by rechecking credible sources, but values conflicts are more difficult. This conflict arises when individuals have drastically different beliefs and values.
Interpersonal moral conflicts can be divided into two types: self-imposed and world-imposed. Agent's actions can lead to self-imposed dilemmas, such as two contradictory promises or two different events. World-imposed dilemmas, on the other hand, are caused by others and cannot be solved by an agent. This distinction is critical for moral theories.