There are many options available for military action when we talk about space wars. These options include different strategies, doctrines, and theories. Also, post-conflict reactions can be discussed. Space military action can be very complex and may even differ from what we imagine. This article explores some of the possibilities.
Theories
Space wars are an option in the future. It is important to understand space power theories in order to understand space warfare's political underpinnings. These theories can be used to improve command judgment and strategic thinking. However, they must be developed separately from air power theories. These theories aim to inform the general public about the different implications of space-based activities.
Space warfare military theories must be based in a deep understanding of space and the forces therein. They must also decide the best tactics to use in space combat. This includes the denial of space capabilities of the enemy, blocking of enemy launch sites, and intercepting ballistic missiles. The theory must also be able to adapt to changing technologies and new adversaries in space.
Doctrine
In the 1980s, the debate over military space power was clouded by Soviet doctrine. The Soviets fought using their own doctrine in outer space, and the United States wanted to protect its strategic nuclear threat from an attack by the Soviet Union. In response, the United States decided to develop offensive space weapons to meet this threat. This sparked a Congress-wide debate about space control.
U.S. Space Force's new guiding document is "Spacepower". This doctrine, which is based on Joint Publication 3-14, outlines the military's vision of its space operations. It was issued just weeks after Defense Space Strategy was published by the Pentagon. The doctrine describes the Space Force's central role during space operations and describes the Space Force as "defending space domain."
Strategies
Space wars, unlike conflict on Earth require the use highly advanced technological systems. Space weapons pose a risk and could lead to a collapse in U.S. policy. Losing a space war would be catastrophic for the United States and the world. For this reason, military leaders are developing space warfare military strategy to stop such a tragic outcome.
Space warfighting theories can be based on a number of different approaches. These concepts encompass all aspects of the nation's operations in a given medium. Space warfare is an extension and variation of this strategy. It can use military, technological, airpower theories.
Post-conflict reactions
The United States and China have developed space weapons that can cause damage, even though they aren't kinetic. Russia has cosorbital weapons while China has direct ascent weapons which are launched into space and then guided to their target. They also have non-kinetic space weapons such as lasers and jamming devices that can interfere with satellite communications. While these weapons are not ideal for combat, they can provide an alternative for both the sexes.
However, space forces must be protected against future adversaries who are expanding their space weaponry capabilities. China's counterspace arsenal, while less dangerous than Russia's satellite fleet, will pose a significant threat to the future. Commercial space must be secured. Otherwise, future wars are likely to be fought blindly.